Case 3314962/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Shah v Greystoke Property Management Ltd and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 3314962/2020
- Decision date
- 12 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr A Shah
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Greystoke Property Management Ltd was the claimant's employer and dismissed all claims against the second respondent, Mr Ali Baker. It found that the claimant was entitled to 8 weeks' notice and had received 8 weeks' notice, but the shortfall in payments for that notice period was accounted for within the unlawful deduction from wages claim, so no separate breach of contract award was made.
The claim for unauthorised deduction from wages succeeded. The tribunal found that the wages properly payable for the period 1 June 2020 to 13 September 2020 were £624 per calendar month, that the respondent paid only £300 per calendar month, and that the aggregate gross deduction was £1,132.40. The working time claim also succeeded: the claimant had taken no annual leave during the partial leave year from 1 January 2020 to 13 September 2020, and under Regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 the tribunal calculated entitlement by reference to a week's pay of £144, producing £567.80 gross.
The tribunal rejected the redundancy and unfair dismissal claims. It found that the claimant was not dismissed by reason of redundancy, was not entitled to a redundancy payment, and was not unfairly dismissed. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the total gross sum of £1,700.20, subject to any lawful PAYE deductions.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the wages properly payable for 1 June 2020 to 13 September 2020 were £624 per calendar month, but the respondent paid only £300 per calendar month, creating an aggregate gross deduction of £1,132.40. | Upheld | — | £1,132 |
| Working time regulations | The claimant had taken no annual leave during the partial leave year from 1 January 2020 to 13 September 2020 and was awarded payment under Regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998, calculated by the tribunal at £567.80 gross. | Upheld | — | £568 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal said the claimant was entitled to 8 weeks' notice and received 8 weeks' notice; the shortfall in payments for that notice period was dealt with under the unlawful deduction from wages claim, so no separate award for breach of contract was made. | Other | — | — |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was not dismissed by reason of redundancy and was not entitled to a redundancy payment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found that the claimant was not unfairly dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,700
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.