Case 3314971/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr Z Malik (solicitor) — 2024
- Case reference
- 3314971/2023
- Decision date
- 13 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Watford before Employment Judge Alliott, heard the case on 12 and 13 December 2024. The claimant, Mr Christopher Rogers, appeared in person and the respondent, XPO Transport Solutions UK Limited, was represented by Mr Z Malik, solicitor.
The only claim recorded in the written judgment is the claimant's claim for unfair dismissal. The tribunal dismissed that claim.
The written record states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing. No written reasons are included in the record provided, so the decision sheet does not set out the tribunal's factual findings or legal reasoning beyond the dismissal itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written record records only that the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed. It states that reasons were given orally at the hearing, but those reasons are not reproduced in the written record. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.