Case 3314973/2022 · Employment Tribunal
C Devlin (counsel) For the v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 3314973/2022
- Decision date
- 7 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anderson Appearances
- Venue
- Reading ET
Parties
1 namedClaimant
C Devlin (counsel) For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, a service delivery assistant employed by First Great Western Limited, brought a claim under section 13(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 alleging unauthorised deductions from wages while she was on sick leave after being assaulted at Twyford Station on 1 July 2022. Her contract provided six weeks at full pay and then six weeks at half pay in the first six months of employment. She relied on section 17(b) of the respondent’s Blue Book policy, which allowed enhanced sickness pay for employees assaulted in the course of their employment.
The tribunal held that the decisive question was whether the assault took place in the course of the claimant’s employment. It preferred the claimant’s submission that the Blue Book should be read according to its ordinary and natural meaning, rather than through vicarious liability authorities said by the respondent to be relevant to the wording. On the facts, the assault occurred before the shift started, while the claimant was parking her car. Although she was in uniform, on the respondent’s premises, and using a staff parking space, she was not carrying out a duty for the respondent at the time.
The tribunal found that travelling to work, including parking at the employer’s premises before a shift, does not generally form part of the course of employment unless the contract says so. It therefore concluded that the claimant had not been assaulted in the course of her employment for the purposes of section 17(b). The claim for unauthorised deduction from wages was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.13(1) ERA 1996
- ordinary and natural meaning
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.