Case 3314978/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S J Underwood v Kings Design Ltd Studio 137 Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3314978/2019
- Decision date
- 9 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S J Underwood
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed the claim against Kings Design Ltd because that respondent had been dissolved. The judgment records no merits findings against the first respondent.
Studio 137 Ltd had not presented a response. The claim against the second respondent succeeded, and the tribunal ordered it to pay the claimant the gross sum of £6,735.08. The written record does not identify any split between separate heads of claim or any additional remedy components.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The claim against Respondent 1 was dismissed because the respondent had been dissolved. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Respondent 2 did not present a response. The claim against Respondent 2 succeeded and the tribunal ordered payment of the gross sum of £6,735.08; the written record does not break that sum down between separate heads of claim. | Upheld | — | £6,735 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,735
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.