Case 3315023/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss G Otelea v E-Event Platform Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3315023/2022
- Decision date
- 14 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss G Otelea
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Watford Employment Tribunals on 16 December 2022. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined that judgment could properly be entered under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The judgment records monetary orders on four heads. The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of a gross sum of £8,500. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £4,040.79.
The tribunal further ordered payment of a gross sum of £3,975.39 for unpaid holiday entitlement. It also directed the respondent to refund £365 for unpaid expenses and £1,250 for unpaid benefits. The total amount recorded by the judgment is £18,131.18.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant a gross sum of £8,500 for unauthorised deductions from wages. | Upheld | — | £8,500 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £4,040.79. | Upheld | — | £4,041 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal ordered payment of a gross sum of £3,975.39 for unpaid holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £3,975 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal ordered the respondent to refund £365 for unpaid expenses and £1,250 for unpaid benefits. | Upheld | — | £1,615 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £18,131
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.