Case 3315063/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Jacks v Eibe Play Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3315063/2020
- Decision date
- 22 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heath
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Jacks
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was heard remotely by CVP at Watford on 11 October 2021 before Employment Judge Heath sitting alone. The claimant, Mr D Jacks, appeared in person and the respondent was represented by its Managing Director, Mr P Redden.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's claim for unauthorised deductions from wages to the extent that it found the respondent had deducted £178.29 from his wages. The written judgment records that the respondent is to pay the claimant £178.29.
The written record states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. No further findings or reasoning are set out in the written decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The written judgment states that the claimant's claim for unauthorised deductions from wages succeeded to the extent that the tribunal found a deduction of £178.29 from wages. The written record notes that reasons were given orally and no written reasons were provided. | Upheld | — | £178 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £178
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.