Case 3315070/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Rob Mullins v Albion Apparel Group Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3315070/2020
- Decision date
- 9 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dick Representation
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Rob Mullins
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr Rob Mullins was unfairly dismissed by Albion Apparel Group Ltd. The respondent did not appear at the hearing. The judgment was given by Employment Judge Dick after hearings on 21 and 22 July 2022, with oral reasons recorded and later issued in writing.
The tribunal awarded compensation for unfair dismissal of £61,759.92. The basic award was assessed at £0 because it was the difference between 10.5 weeks' gross pay and the redundancy payment already made. The compensatory award was calculated by reference to loss to the date of hearing and future loss, including figures for lost earnings, loss of statutory rights, and pension loss.
The tribunal recorded total loss at £89,253.78, grossed up to £105,479.48, but applied the statutory cap of 52 weeks' gross pay, producing the final compensatory figure of £61,759.92. The judgment also states that the recoupment regulations do not apply.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £61,760 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £61,760
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £0
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £61,760
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.