Case 3315080/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Sojobi in person For the v Ms Pat Akwenuke (Director) of Kings Kid Nursey — 2022
- Case reference
- 3315080/2020
- Decision date
- 9 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Daley Representation
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Sojobi in person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard Ms Ester Sojobi in person for the claimant and Ms Pat Akwenuke, director of the respondent, at Watford on 20 January 2022 before Employment Judge Daley. The written judgment records two claims only: a complaint under section 1(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and a complaint under section 8 of that Act.
Both claims were dismissed. The judgment states that the section 8 claim was out of time and that the tribunal lacked jurisdiction because it had not been brought within the time limit in section 11(4) ERA 1996. The extracted text does not give a separate reason for the dismissal of the section 1(2) claim, and no monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Complaint under section 1(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The extracted judgment dismisses the claim but does not give a separate reason for this head. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Complaint under section 8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. Dismissed because the tribunal lacked jurisdiction as the claim was not brought within the time limit in section 11(4) ERA 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.