Case 3315169/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Lama v Light as Feather Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3315169/2022
- Decision date
- 19 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Lama
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss J Lama’s claim was heard at Reading by CVP on 25 October 2023 before Employment Judge Anstis sitting alone. The respondent did not attend or take part, and the judgment was issued under Rule 21. The tribunal recorded that the respondent had made unlawful deductions from the claimant’s wages and had not paid holiday pay to her.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £615 net as compensation for those breaches. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested in time, so the published decision contains no further findings on the underlying calculation beyond the award itself.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the respondent made unlawful deductions from wages. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the respondent did not pay holiday pay. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £615
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £615
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.