Case 3315189/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Lopes v Humber Teaching NHS Foundation Trust — 2023
- Case reference
- 3315189/2022
- Decision date
- 31 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment Members
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Lopes
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs S Lopes brought complaints of detriment and dismissal under section 47C and section 99 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and under regulations 19 and 20(1)(a) of the Maternity & Parental Leave etc. Regulations 1999. She also brought a claim of direct sex discrimination under section 13 of the Equality Act 2010.
At the hearing on 31 March 2023 before Employment Judge Maidment in Leeds by CVP, the tribunal recorded that these complaints were dismissed because the claimant withdrew them. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on liability beyond that withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parental leave | The claimant's complaints of detriment and dismissal pursuant to sections 47C and 99 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and regulations 19 and 20(1)(a) of the Maternity & Parental Leave etc. Regulations 1999 were dismissed upon withdrawal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The direct sex discrimination complaint under section 13 of the Equality Act 2010 was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.