Case 3315207/2022 · Employment Tribunal

Ms S Cashell, counsel and (until 12.00) Ms J Taylor, solicitor For the First v Respondent — 2023

Case reference: 3315207/2022
Decision date: 8 November 2023
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge George Appearances
Venue: Reading

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

1 named

Claimant

Ms S Cashell, counsel and (until 12.00) Ms J Taylor, solicitor For the First

Respondent

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal found that the claimant's contract of employment transferred from the second respondent, N & S Fitness Limited, to the first respondent, J D Fitness Group Limited, on or about 14 October 2022 by means of a relevant transfer within the meaning of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006. The decision records that the transfer fell within TUPE.

The tribunal also held that reg.8(7) TUPE did not apply to that transfer. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment, and the written record contains only these TUPE findings and the formal appearances and hearing details.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Transfer of undertakings (TUPE)	The tribunal found that the claimant's contract of employment transferred from the second respondent to the first respondent on or about 14 October 2022 by means of a relevant transfer within the meaning of the TUPE Regulations 2006, and that reg.8(7) TUPE did not apply.	Upheld	—	—

Legal tests applied

2 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.