Case 3315238/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Commissioner for HM Revenue and Customs — 2021
- Case reference
- 3315238/2020
- Decision date
- 25 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the matter remotely by CVP at Watford on 20 August and 7 October 2021 before Employment Judge de Silva QC. The judgment records that the hearing was conducted on the papers, that the parties did not object to a remote hearing, and that a face-to-face hearing was not practicable.
The only substantive determination recorded in the written judgment is that Jason Gilbert was a worker in the service of the Appellant pursuant to section 54 of the National Minimum Wage Act 1998. The extracted record does not set out any further findings or separate monetary remedy.
The decision also notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No panel members are listed in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal decided that Jason Gilbert was a worker in the service of the Appellant pursuant to section 54 of the National Minimum Wage Act 1998. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 54 of the National Minimum Wage Act 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.