Case 3315265/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person. For the v Mr O Dear (Solicitor). — 2021
- Case reference
- 3315265/2020
- Decision date
- 15 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laidler Appearances
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person. For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal record for the hearing at Bury St Edmunds on 9 September 2021, before Employment Judge Laidler, states that Mr Jaeson Edwards appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr O Dear. The written judgment records that the claims of disability discrimination and discrimination on the grounds of marriage and civil partnership were dismissed on withdrawal.
No substantive liability findings or monetary award are recorded in the written text. The note at the end of the judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time, so the public record contains only the disposal of the two discrimination claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the disability discrimination claim was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Marriage or civil partnership discrimination | The judgment states that the discrimination claim on the grounds of marriage and civil partnership was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Marriage / civil partnership | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.