Case 3315269/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Wijayahewage v Myl Udayan — 2025
- Case reference
- 3315269/2023
- Decision date
- 3 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Wijayahewage
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard in public at Watford on 2 December 2024 before Employment Judge Quill sitting alone. Mr G Wijayahewage did not appear or have representation. Myl Udayan attended in person.
The written judgment made a procedural order that any claim against Myl Udayan was struck out under Rule 37. It also recorded that any other potential claim against any other potential respondent was dismissed under Rule 47. The record says reasons were given orally at the hearing, so no written reasons were provided. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The written judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type. It states that any claim against Myl Udayan was struck out under Rule 37. The judgment also states that any other potential claim against any other potential respondent was dismissed under Rule 47. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 37
- Rule 47
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.