Case 3315316/2023 · Employment Tribunal
No attendance or v Ms E Dowey, litigation consultant — 2024
- Case reference
- 3315316/2023
- Decision date
- 10 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge George Appearances
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
No attendance or
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought a claim which appeared to allege that she had not been paid for periods of annual leave, with GBP 2,882 said to be owing. The respondent disputed the calculation but accepted that, on termination of employment, there had been a shortfall of GBP 129 before deductions for tax and National Insurance Contributions.
The claimant did not attend the hearing. The tribunal found that notice of hearing and a strike-out warning had been sent to the claimant's preferred email address, correctly spelled, with no bounce-back, and that she had not responded to the warning or given a satisfactory reason for non-attendance.
The tribunal was shown evidence that the respondent had paid the accepted outstanding sum on 28 June 2024. It concluded that the claimant had not complied with case management orders, had not actively pursued the claim, and had not shown why the claim should proceed, so the claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(c) and (d).
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The claim appeared to be a complaint of failure to pay for periods of annual leave. The claimant alleged GBP 2,882 was owing. The respondent accepted a shortfall of GBP 129 before deductions and evidence showed that amount had been paid on 28 June 2024. The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(c) and (d), and made no award. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37(1)(c) Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- rule 37(1)(d) Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.