Case 3315327/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Grenville Dias v Total Facilities Recruitment Ltd and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 3315327/2023
- Decision date
- 8 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott Representation
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr Grenville Dias
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr Grenville Dias was engaged by Total Facilities Recruitment Ltd under a contract for services as an agency worker, not under a contract of employment, and rejected his case that he had a guaranteed six-month role with 40 hours per week. It also rejected any wider employment claim against Clipper Contracting Group Ltd, and the claims against that respondent were dismissed.
On the evidence about the placement at Watford General Hospital, the tribunal accepted the hirer's records and found that the claimant worked 23.5 hours from 4 to 6 October 2023. It accepted that the site required a Level 4 Food Safety certificate, that the claimant was chased for the document, and that he was sent home without pay on 6 October after he had not produced it.
The tribunal found that deductions from the claimant's gross pay for Employer's National Insurance, an apprenticeship levy and a management margin were not authorised by any written agreement or relevant assignment schedule. It therefore upheld the unauthorised deductions claim against the first respondent and calculated the amount due as £480.81 for hours worked plus £58.03 rolled-up holiday pay, making £538.84 gross, subject to tax and National Insurance, with credit for £370.89 already paid net.
The remaining claims were dismissed. The breach of contract claim for notice pay and the separate holiday pay claim were dismissed, as was the redundancy payment claim because the claimant did not have the requisite two years' continuous service. The discrimination claims were also dismissed because, despite being given an opportunity to explain them, the claimant did not advance a discrimination case.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Award against the first respondent only. The tribunal found no written agreement or relevant assignment schedule authorising the deductions, and calculated £480.81 for hours worked plus £58.03 rolled-up holiday pay. The claimant was to give credit for £370.89 already paid net. | Upheld | — | £539 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim against both respondents dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Separate holiday pay claim against both respondents dismissed. The tribunal nevertheless included 12.07% rolled-up holiday pay in the successful wage calculation. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | Dismissed because the claimant did not have two years' continuous service. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Discrimination claims dismissed. The tribunal noted that, despite an opportunity to explain any discrimination case, the claimant did not advance one. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £539
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.27 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.