Case 3315332/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Montgomery v Evox Therapeutics Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 3315332/2023
- Decision date
- 29 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Montgomery
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim. It recorded that by letter dated 14 May 2025 the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because she had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 26 September 2024 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal ordered that the claim be struck out. The judgment does not contain any findings on the merits of the underlying dispute or any award of remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying claim type in the extracted text. The claim was struck out because the claimant did not comply with the Tribunal's order dated 26 September 2024 and had not actively pursued the claim; after a letter dated 14 May 2025 inviting representations or a request for a hearing, no sufficient response was made. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.