Case 3315334/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Lee Betchley, Counsel For the v Mr Philip Page, Solicitor — 2023
- Case reference
- 3315334/2020
- Decision date
- 4 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan Members
- Venue
- Cambridge
- Panel members
- Ms L Davies, Ms KL Johnson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Lee Betchley, Counsel For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at Cambridge on 20, 21 and 22 March 2023 before Employment Judge Tynan, sitting with members Ms L Davies and Ms KL Johnson. The claimant was represented by Mr Lee Betchley and the respondent by Mr Philip Page.
In the written judgment, the tribunal recorded that the claimant's various complaints that he had been discriminated against because of the protected characteristic of race were not well founded. Those complaints were dismissed.
The extracted decision does not set out any separate liability findings, legal test, or monetary remedy. It is recorded that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the claimant's various complaints that he was discriminated against because of race were not well founded and were dismissed. No separate remedy was awarded. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.