Case 3315336/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Lewis v Network Rail Infrastructure Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3315336/2022
- Decision date
- 14 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Youngs JUDGMENT
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Lewis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant's claim for unlawful deductions from wages succeeded. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £3,420, described as the gross sum deducted, subject to deductions for employee tax and National Insurance.
The tribunal also found that the respondent unreasonably failed to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures. It considered it just and equitable to increase compensation by 15% under s 207A Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, resulting in a further award of £513.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states the gross sum deducted was £3,420 and awards a further £513 as a 15% ACAS Code uplift. | Upheld | — | £3,420 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,933
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £3,420
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
2 references- ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures
- s 207A Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.