Case 3315421/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P L Rotaru v Do & Co Event & Airline Catering Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3315421/2020
- Decision date
- 2 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maxwell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P L Rotaru
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that, by a case management order dated 14 July 2023, the claimant had been identified as pursuing what appeared to be duplicate claims. He was warned that if the duplicate claims were not withdrawn by 11 August 2023, the Tribunal would consider striking them out.
The claimant did not withdraw the claims or provide reasons why he should be permitted to pursue them. The Tribunal found that pursuing the same complaints in two sets of proceedings was an abuse of process, that the second claim had no reasonable prospect of succeeding, and that continuing in that way was unreasonable.
The claims in case number 3315421/2020 were struck out under rule 37(a) and (b). The Tribunal stated that claim number 315398/2020 was not struck out and would continue.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment strikes out the claimant's claims in this case under rule 37(a) and (b) as duplicate claims. The underlying complaints are not individually identified in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37(a) and (b)
- abuse of process
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.