Case 3315459/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E Grange v Vertu Motors VMC Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3315459/2020
- Decision date
- 30 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge George Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr E Grange
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 30 September 2021, Employment Judge George Date issued a withdrawal judgment in case 3315459/2020. The tribunal recorded that the claimant's complaints of direct age discrimination, race discrimination other than his complaint that his dismissal was an act of direct race discrimination, and unauthorised deduction from wages/breach of contract were dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant.
The judgment also recorded that the claimant's remaining claims of unfair dismissal and of a racially discriminatory dismissal would proceed to a hearing listed for 28 June to 1 July 2022. No monetary award was made in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | Dismissed in this withdrawal judgment following the claimant's withdrawal of the complaint. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Race discrimination | Dismissed in this withdrawal judgment. The dismissal covered the race discrimination complaints other than the separate allegation that dismissal itself was an act of direct race discrimination, which remained live for later hearing. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed in this withdrawal judgment following the claimant's withdrawal of the complaint. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed in this withdrawal judgment following the claimant's withdrawal of the complaint. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.