Case 3315464/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss H Murray v Atalian Servest Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3315464/2020
- Decision date
- 15 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr. A.
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss H Murray
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Norwich by remote video hearing on 24 August 2021 before Employment Judge A Spencer sitting alone. Neither the claimant nor the respondent attended, and the tribunal attempted to contact both parties by telephone without success.
The judgment records that, upon neither party attending the hearing, all claims were dismissed. No monetary remedy was awarded or addressed in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The gov.uk listing categorised the case as including breach of contract. The judgment itself states that all claims were dismissed after neither party attended. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The gov.uk listing categorised the case as including Working Time Regulations. The judgment itself states that all claims were dismissed after neither party attended. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The gov.uk listing referred to a written pay statement claim. The judgment itself states that all claims were dismissed after neither party attended. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.