Case 3315469/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Clifford v British Airways plc — 2025
- Case reference
- 3315469/2022
- Decision date
- 12 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hawksworth
- Venue
- Reading
- Panel members
- Ms A Crosby, Dr C Whitehouse
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Clifford
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a judgment by consent under rule 62. It recorded that the claimant's complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages for the period 7 to 14 September 2022 was well-founded and succeeded.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £732.56. The judgment stated that the claimant's other complaints were unaffected by this judgment and would proceed to hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment by consent states that the complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages during 7 to 14 September 2022 is well-founded and succeeds. Other complaints are expressly unaffected and will proceed to hearing, so they are not treated as adjudicated in this judgment. | Upheld | — | £733 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £733
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules rule 62
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.