Case 3315857/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Earle v City Plumbing Supplies Holdings Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3315857/2021
- Decision date
- 30 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Howden-Evans Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Earle
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAfter hearing evidence from Mr Earle, considering the documents in the bundle, and hearing submissions from both parties, the employment judge found that Mr Earle did not have a disability at the relevant time within the meaning of s6 Equality Act 2010. On that basis, Mr Earle's disability discrimination claims were dismissed.
The judgment did not determine the unfair dismissal claim. It records that Mr Earle's unfair dismissal claim would be determined at the hearing listed for 3 to 5 April 2023. No remedy was awarded in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The employment judge found that, at the relevant time, Mr Earle did not have a disability as defined in s6 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s6 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.