Case 3315868/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Kalangila v Fifth Zone Limited and and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 3315868/2021
- Decision date
- 27 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto JUDGMENT
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr J Kalangila
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal did not determine the merits of Mr J Kalangila's claims against Fifth Zone Limited and Oxford Pallets Limited. By a letter dated 20 March 2023, it gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because he had not complied with the tribunal's order dated 17 December 2022 and the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The judgment is dated 3 March 2023 and was sent to the parties on 27 March 2023. No remedy was awarded, and the judgment contains no separate findings on the underlying unlawful deduction from wages or working time allegations.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not set out separate reasoning on the underlying allegation; the claim was struck out as part of the case as a whole for non-compliance and lack of active pursuit. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment does not set out separate reasoning on the underlying allegation; the claim was struck out as part of the case as a whole for non-compliance and lack of active pursuit. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.