Case 3315918/2021 · Employment Tribunal

Miss B Lock v Wm Morrison Supermarkets Limited — 2023

Case reference: 3315918/2021
Decision date: 14 September 2023
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge McTigue Representation
Venue: Watford

Indexed: 19 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss B Lock

Respondent

Wm Morrison Supermarkets Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The case was heard at Watford Employment Tribunal on 13 September 2023 before Employment Judge McTigue. The claimant appeared as a litigant in person and the respondent was represented by counsel.

The tribunal ordered that all of the claimant's claims under case number 3315918/2021 were struck out under rule 37(1) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The written judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided if requested within the applicable time limit.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Breach of contract	The written judgment states that all of the claimant's claims under this case number were struck out under rule 37(1). The specific claim type is inferred from the listed judgment category rather than set out in the body of the judgment.	Struck out	—	—
Unlawful deduction from wages	The written judgment states that all of the claimant's claims under this case number were struck out under rule 37(1). The specific claim type is inferred from the listed judgment category rather than set out in the body of the judgment.	Struck out	—	—
Working time regulations	The written judgment states that all of the claimant's claims under this case number were struck out under rule 37(1). The specific claim type is inferred from the listed judgment category rather than set out in the body of the judgment.	Struck out	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.