Case 3315976/2019 · Employment Tribunal

Mr B Chaker v Salvatore Rullo — 2019

Case reference: 3315976/2019
Decision date: 23 September 2019
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Bedeau Date

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr B Chaker

Respondent

Salvatore Rullo

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

This was a rule 21 judgment. The tribunal recorded that the Respondent had not presented a response to the claims, so judgment was entered in the Claimant's favour on the papers.

The judgment states that the Respondent was adjudged to owe the Claimant notice money, arrears of wages and holiday pay. No figures were fixed in this judgment, because the amount owed was expressly left to be determined at a further hearing listed for Tuesday 18 February 2020 at 10.00am.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Breach of contract	The rule 21 judgment records that the Respondent did not present a response and adjudges that it owes notice money. The amount was to be determined at a later hearing.	Upheld	—	—
Unlawful deduction from wages	The rule 21 judgment records that the Respondent did not present a response and adjudges that it owes arrears of wages. The amount was to be determined at a later hearing.	Upheld	—	—
Holiday pay	The rule 21 judgment records that the Respondent did not present a response and adjudges that it owes holiday pay. The amount was to be determined at a later hearing.	Upheld	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.