Case 3315985/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Cantor v Krohne Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3315985/2019
- Decision date
- 9 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Manley Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Cantor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the proceedings in case 3315985/2019 were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the Claimant, Mr L Cantor. The respondent was Krohne Limited. The tribunal did not make any findings on the substance of the dispute.
Because the claim was withdrawn, the judgment contains no liability determination, no discussion of remedy, and no award. The only substantive outcome recorded is that the proceedings were dismissed.
On the information in the judgment and the case listing, the matter included unfair dismissal and disability discrimination claims, but the judgment itself does not separately analyse those claims or set out any legal reasoning on the merits.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the Claimant; no merits findings are made. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the Claimant; no merits findings are made. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.