Case 3316014/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person. For the v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 3316014/2019
- Decision date
- 10 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S King Appearances
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person. For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe written judgment records that Ms R Perchard's discrimination claims against Sanctuary Personnel Limited were dismissed at the Bury St Edmunds Employment Tribunal on 10 March 2020 before Employment Judge S King. The judgment itself does not set out the tribunal's reasons in detail or identify the protected characteristic in the written text; the case listing categorises the claim as disability discrimination.
The record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record being sent to the parties. No monetary award is recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The written judgment states that the claimant's claims for discrimination were dismissed. The written record does not specify the protected characteristic, but the case listing categorises the matter as disability discrimination. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.