Case 3316045/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Z Faqi v Mr M Yusuf Faisal Heard: by Cloud Video Platform — 2021
- Case reference
- 3316045/2019
- Decision date
- 23 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T Brown Tribunal
- Panel members
- Ms J Costley, Mr D Snashall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Z Faqi
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting before Employment Judge T Brown with tribunal members Ms J Costley and Mr D Snashall, declared that Mr M Yusuf Faisal unfairly dismissed Ms Z Faqi contrary to section 99 Employment Rights Act 1996. It also declared that, in dismissing her, the respondent contravened the Equality Act 2010 contrary to sections 18 and 39. The supplied written record sets out the declarations and remedy, but not the full oral reasons.
The tribunal ordered compensation of £23,988.89, made up of £15,000 for injury to feelings, £6,209.14 for past loss of earnings, £2,303.08 interest on the injury-to-feelings award, and £476.67 interest on past loss of earnings. The record states that, having regard to section 126 Employment Rights Act 1996, no compensatory award was made under sections 118 and 123 of the 1996 Act.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The judgment declared that, in dismissing the claimant, the respondent contravened the Equality Act 2010 contrary to sections 18 and 39. The monetary award was not split between the claims in the written record. | Upheld | Pregnancy and maternity | £23,989 |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal declared that the claimant was unfairly dismissed contrary to section 99 Employment Rights Act 1996. The judgment states that no compensatory award was made under sections 118 and 123 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 having regard to section 126. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £23,989
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £6,209
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 99 Employment Rights Act 1996
- sections 18 and 39 Equality Act 2010
- section 126 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.