Case 3316125/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Walton v Grant & Stone Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3316125/2019
- Decision date
- 27 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Palmer
- Venue
- in private
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Walton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was determined at an open preliminary hearing in private before Employment Judge C Palmer sitting alone on 27 February 2020. The tribunal held that it had no jurisdiction to hear the claimant's claims because they were out of time and time was not extended.
Accordingly, the claims failed and were dismissed. The written record does not record any merits findings or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written record does not list the claim heads individually; this claim type is inferred from the case listing context. The tribunal held the claims were out of time and time was not extended. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The written record does not list the claim heads individually; this claim type is inferred from the case listing context. The tribunal held the claims were out of time and time was not extended. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The written record does not list the claim heads individually; this claim type is inferred from the case listing context. The tribunal held the claims were out of time and time was not extended. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.