Case 3316457/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr James Kay v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 3316457/2021
- Decision date
- 7 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JUDGMENT The
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr James Kay
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent submitted an ET3 indicating that it did not intend to defend the claim. On the information available to Employment Judge M Warren, the tribunal found that Mr James Kay was dismissed by reason of redundancy.
The judgment therefore upheld the claimant's entitlement to a redundancy payment and awarded £4,185.60. No other claim type, legal test, or separate remedy component is identified in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £4,186 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,186
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.