Case 3316459/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A M Bell v Doublecheck Cleaning/AD Super Clean — 2022
- Case reference
- 3316459/2021
- Decision date
- 4 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A M Bell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 1 September 2022 Employment Judge Anstis struck out the claim brought by Miss A M Bell against Doublecheck Cleaning/AD Super Clean. The tribunal had written on 23 July 2022 to give the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out for failure to comply with the tribunal's orders dated 17 June 2022 and because the matter had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. No substantive liability findings or remedy award were made.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not identify the underlying claim type, but the case listing categories included breach of contract. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not set out the substantive claim details; the case listing categories included unfair dismissal. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment does not set out the substantive claim details; the case listing categories included working time regulations. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.