Case 3316463/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs N. Sharif Ali v Oasis Care & Training Agency — 2022
- Case reference
- 3316463/2021
- Decision date
- 26 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McNeill QC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs N. Sharif Ali
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Mrs N. Sharif Ali’s claim for unfair (constructive) dismissal was well-founded and upheld it. The judgment does not set out any further liability findings beyond that conclusion.
After the liability decision, the claimant’s solicitor confirmed that the only remedy still sought was compensation for unfair dismissal, because the other claims had already been satisfied. The parties then agreed that the respondent would pay £6,000 within 14 days in full and final settlement of the claims and would provide a reference to the claimant.
In those circumstances, the tribunal made no orders as to remedy. The written record notes that reasons for the judgment were given orally and that written reasons would only be provided if requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal described the claim as unfair (constructive) dismissal. Liability was upheld, but after judgment the parties agreed a full and final settlement of £6,000 and a reference, and the tribunal made no remedy orders. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.