Case 3316470/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N A Santos-Davila v St Mungo Community Housing Association — 2023
- Case reference
- 3316470/2021
- Decision date
- 21 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Eeley Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N A Santos-Davila
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal held that Mr N A Santos-Davila presented his unfair dismissal claim outside the primary limitation period. It found that it had been reasonably practicable for him to comply with the time limit, that the test in section 111(2)(b) Employment Rights Act 1996 was not satisfied, and that time would not be extended. The unfair dismissal claim was therefore dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
The Tribunal also held that the disability discrimination claim had been presented outside the primary limitation period, but found that it was just and equitable to extend time under section 123(1)(b) Equality Act 2010. That claim was therefore permitted to proceed to a final hearing, rather than being finally determined in this judgment.
The respondent conceded that the claimant was disabled by reason of depression during the relevant period. The Tribunal found that the claimant satisfied the definition of disability in section 6 Equality Act 2010 by reason of anxiety and depression, but was not satisfied that he was disabled by reason of Avoidance Personality Disorder, Autistic Spectrum Disorder, PTSD, Borderline Personality Disorder, Dependent Personality Disorder or Obsessive Compulsive Personality Disorder. No remedy was awarded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the claim was presented outside the primary limitation period and time was not extended. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The discrimination claim was not finally determined. Time was extended on just and equitable grounds and the claim was permitted to proceed to a final hearing; disability was determined for identified impairments only. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 111(2)(b) Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 123(1)(b) Equality Act 2010
- section 6 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.