Case 3318751/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A. MacKiewicz v Better Bathrooms (UK) Limited (in administration) — 2020
- Case reference
- 3318751/2019
- Decision date
- 7 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Chudleigh
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A. MacKiewicz
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a combined Rule 21 judgment in proceedings brought by two claimants against the respondent, which had not filed a response. In relation to Mrs A. MacKiewicz, the tribunal considered a claim for a protective award and a claim for damages for notice pay.
The tribunal found that both of Mrs MacKiewicz’s claims had been presented out of time. It therefore held that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain either claim and dismissed them. No monetary award was made to her.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award claim under the Trade Union and Labour Relations Act 1992 was presented out of time; the tribunal said it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Claim for damages in respect of notice pay under the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction Order 1994 was presented out of time; the tribunal said it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.