Case 3318754/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Did not attend and was not represented. For the v Bradshaw Support Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3318754/2019
- Decision date
- 23 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cassel Appearances
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Did not attend and was not represented. For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant complained of arrears of pay and, in the particulars of claim, identified outstanding pay of £2,920.73. The respondent did not present a response by the deadline, and Employment Judge Michell had directed that the respondent would only be entitled to participate in any hearing to the extent permitted under Rule 21(3).
Neither party attended the hearing on 5 March 2020. As no response had been presented, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the sums claimed in the claim form, namely £2,920.73 gross, with the respondent to account to the claimant and HMRC for any income tax or national insurance deductions. The recoupment provisions did not apply.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes the claim as arrears of pay and awards the sum claimed in the ET1. It does not use the phrase unlawful deduction from wages, but that is the closest taxonomy category. | Upheld | — | £2,921 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,921
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21(3)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.