Case 3318762/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person. For the v Carl Pritchard T/a I Cube — 2020
- Case reference
- 3318762/2019
- Decision date
- 6 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge KJ Palmer
- Venue
- Norwich
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person. For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Norwich, before Employment Judge KJ Palmer, heard Mr L Drummie’s claims against Carl Pritchard T/A I Cube on 28 January 2020. The respondent was not represented. The written judgment records that each of the claimant’s claims succeeded: unlawful deduction of wages, redundancy payment, breach of contract for failure to pay notice, and holiday pay.
The tribunal awarded £215.28 for unlawful deduction of wages, £2,475 for the redundancy payment claim, £1,995 as damages for failure to pay notice, and £346.38 for holiday pay. The judgment then stated that the total sum payable by the respondent to the claimant was £5,031.66. No separate findings on liability reasoning are set out in the short written record, and the judgment notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal made a declaration that the claim succeeded and awarded £215.28. | Upheld | — | £215 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal held the redundancy payment claim succeeded and awarded £2,475. | Upheld | — | £2,475 |
| Breach of contract | Damages were awarded for failure to pay notice, described in the judgment as breach of contract. | Upheld | — | £1,995 |
| Holiday pay | The holiday pay claim succeeded and £346.38 was awarded. | Upheld | — | £346 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,032
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.