Case 3318769/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Jet Airways (India) Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3318769/2019
- Decision date
- 11 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 11 February 2021, the Tribunal gave the claimants an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing explaining why the claims should not be struck out on the basis that they had not been actively pursued. The respondent was Jet Airways (India) Ltd and the judgment covers case numbers 3318769/2019, 3318781/2019, 3319415/2019, 3319617/2019, 3320124/2019 and 3322281/2019.
The claimants did not make representations in writing, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge R Lewis recorded that the claims were struck out. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying complaints or any remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type(s). It records that the claims in case numbers 3318769/2019, 3318781/2019, 3319415/2019, 3319617/2019, 3320124/2019 and 3322281/2019 were struck out because they had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.