Case 3318782/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E Dcunha v Jet Airways (India) Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 3318782/2019
- Decision date
- 26 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr E Dcunha
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the Claimant was Mr E Dcunha and the Respondent was Jet Airways (India) Limited. It does not set out any substantive findings on the merits of the claims.
The only operative decision in the extracted text is that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claims by the Claimant. No liability findings, legal analysis, or remedy assessment are recorded in the judgment text provided.
The judgment is dated 5 March 2020 and was sent to the parties on 11 March 2020.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claims by the Claimant. No separate determination is given for this claim type in the extracted text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claims by the Claimant. No separate determination is given for this claim type in the extracted text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claims by the Claimant. No separate determination is given for this claim type in the extracted text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.