Case 3318909/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Rebecca Atkins v Zaneta Lichnova — 2020
- Case reference
- 3318909/2019
- Decision date
- 4 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Rebecca Atkins
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a telephone preliminary hearing on 1 April 2020, at which the claimant did not attend, the tribunal considered the respondent's position as explained by Mr Thomas Clarke and was satisfied that the respondent had had a reasonable opportunity to make representations in writing or at a hearing.
The tribunal struck out the respondent's response to the holiday pay claim under rule 37(1)(a) on the ground that it had no reasonable prospect of success. It then proceeded on the basis of the claim and found that the respondent had failed to pay holiday pay to the claimant.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £331.00 in respect of the holiday pay claim. No separate breakdown of remedy components was given in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The response to the holiday pay claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(a) because it had no reasonable prospect of success; the tribunal then found the respondent had failed to pay holiday pay and ordered payment of £331.00. | Upheld | — | £331 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £331
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37(1)(a)
- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.