Case 3318956/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms H Bennett v London Borough of Islington — 2020
- Case reference
- 3318956/2019
- Decision date
- 6 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dobbie
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms H Bennett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing, the tribunal found that the three sets of written particulars of claim sent by the claimant's representative on 26 February 2020 had been attached to the originating online ET1 applications submitted on 7 June, 30 July and 26 November 2019. The claims set out in those documents were therefore validly before the tribunal.
The tribunal stated that, even if it had not made that finding, it would have exercised its discretion to allow the claims to be added by amendment. It also clarified that time had not been extended for any claims that may be out of time, and that limitation issue would be determined at the final hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Preliminary hearing judgment only. The tribunal determined that the written particulars of claim were validly before the tribunal, or alternatively would have allowed them by amendment. It did not adjudicate the substantive claims or identify their claim types in the judgment text. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.