Case 3318969/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Greenwood v Inn Credible Pub Co - Beeswing Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3318969/2019
- Decision date
- 30 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord Appearances
- Venue
- Huntingdon
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L Greenwood
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a remote remedy hearing before Employment Judge Ord on 30 April 2020. The claimant, Mrs L Greenwood, appeared in person. The respondent, Inn Credible Pub Co - Beeswing Ltd, did not attend and was not represented.
The tribunal entered judgment for the claimant in respect of unlawful deduction from wages for the period 18 October 2018 to 10 April 2019, in the sum of £6,602.40. It also awarded £1,666.78 for breach of contract, identified as unpaid notice pay.
The written record states that the total due to the claimant was £8,269.19. No separate breakdown beyond those two sums is given, and the judgment records that reasons were given orally, with no written reasons provided in the absence of a request.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded for unlawful deduction from wages during the period 18 October 2018 to 10 April 2019. | Upheld | — | £6,602 |
| Breach of contract | Awarded for unpaid notice pay. | Upheld | — | £1,667 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,269
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.