Case 3318978/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Illman v Complete Business Solutions SA T/a Emex — 2019
- Case reference
- 3318978/2019
- Decision date
- 23 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Illman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a response, and under Rule 21 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 Employment Judge Anstis entered judgment for the claimant on the claims within jurisdiction. The tribunal recorded that Mr J Illman was owed unpaid wages and awarded him £8,686.98 for unlawful deduction from wages.
The tribunal also recorded that Mr Illman was owed unpaid expenses and awarded him £2,539.14 for breach of contract. The respondent was ordered to pay both sums.
The claimant's separate claim for compensation for stress was struck out because it was not within the jurisdiction of the tribunal. The hearing listed for 4 November 2019 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claimant was owed unpaid wages and awarded £8,686.98 in compensation. | Upheld | — | £8,687 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was owed unpaid expenses and awarded £2,539.14 in compensation. | Upheld | — | £2,539 |
| Other | The claimant's claim for compensation for stress was struck out because it was not within the tribunal's jurisdiction. | Struck out | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,226
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.