Case 3318990/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Zigfrid Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 3318990/2019
- Decision date
- 17 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JL Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent failed to file an ET3 Grounds of Resistance. Employment Judge JL Wade therefore determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, without a hearing, on the basis of the ET1.
The tribunal found that the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay wages to Mr P Grecco de Olivera Arruda. The judgment did not record any dispute on the facts because no grounds of resistance were filed.
As remedy, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £348.50 gross unpaid wages and a further £50 towards loss sustained attributable to the failure to pay wages, referring to section 24(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The total award recorded by the judgment was £398.50.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment: the respondent did not file an ET3, so the claim was determined on the papers without a hearing. The tribunal found the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay wages. | Upheld | — | £399 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £399
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £50
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.