Case 3318997/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Lockwood v RAVV Enterprise Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 3318997/2019
- Decision date
- 10 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Spencer
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Lockwood
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Spencer determined the matter under Rule 21. The tribunal found that RAVV Enterprise Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Miss A Lockwood's wages and ordered payment of £153.75 gross.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £418.20. A further finding was made that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement, for which £232.00 gross was ordered.
The judgment records no discrimination, unfair dismissal, or other statutory claims. The listed hearing on 6 December 2019 was cancelled. The total monetary award on the face of the judgment is £803.95.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £153.75. | Upheld | — | £154 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found dismissal was in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £418.20. | Upheld | — | £418 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross sum of £232.00. | Upheld | — | £232 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £804
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.