Case 3318999/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Mark Mills v Generator Power Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3318999/2019
- Decision date
- 21 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hawksworth
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Mark Mills
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Mark Mills worked for Generator Power Limited from 16 October 2017 to 1 February 2019. He was hired as a Yard Engineer at £12.50 per hour, and his written contract stated that rate, with a pay review after probation and no obligation on the company to increase salary. Although his duties changed on 4 December 2017 from depot-based work to site-based work as a Field Service or Mobile Engineer, the tribunal found that no contract variation or agreed pay rise followed.
The claimant said his hourly rate should have increased to £13.50 from 12 December 2017. The tribunal found that Mr Manley was not authorised to agree any increase or alter terms and conditions, and that the claimant knew any change had to come from head office. The respondent’s service director decided not to award a pay rise until the claimant had sync engineer training, which he did not receive. A Reading Depot rates document showing different rates from December 2018 onwards was not part of the claimant’s contract.
Applying section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and the question of whether the higher rate was properly payable, the tribunal held that the claimant had no legal entitlement to be paid £13.50 per hour either after the change of role or after completion of probation. The arrears of pay claim therefore failed and was dismissed. The tribunal also noted that the unfair dismissal complaint had been withdrawn before the hearing and was dismissed on withdrawal on 10 December 2019.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The complaint of unfair dismissal was dismissed on withdrawal on 10 December 2019. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant sought arrears based on an hourly rate of £13.50 rather than £12.50 from 12 December 2017; the tribunal found he had no contractual entitlement to the higher rate and that it was not properly payable. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.13 ERA 1996
- Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction Order 1994 article 3
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.