Case 3319000/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Ntemi v Respondent — 2026
- Case reference
- 3319000/2019
- Decision date
- 26 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JUDGMENT
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr J Ntemi
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal considered the claimant's claims for unpaid wages and notice pay against Boss Security Services Limited. The respondent had not presented a valid response in time, and the judgment was issued on the basis of the information before Employment Judge M Warren.
The tribunal upheld the unpaid wages claim and ordered the respondent to pay £1,386. It also upheld the notice pay claim and ordered payment of £198. The judgment states that these sums were payable without deduction and were taxable in the hands of the claimant.
The total payable to Mr J Ntemi was £1,584. The judgment does not record any separate findings on discrimination or other remedies, and it does not identify any legal test by name.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claim for unpaid wages succeeds and orders payment of £1,386. | Upheld | — | £1,386 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claim for notice pay succeeds and orders payment of £198. | Upheld | — | £198 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,584
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.