Case 3319013/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Campbell v The Girls Educational Company Limited and 2 others — 2020
- Case reference
- 3319013/2019
- Decision date
- 14 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge George
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mr N Campbell
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing on 7 January 2021 listed to consider whether deposit orders should be made against the claimant. Before the merits of that application were determined, the claimant informed the tribunal that he intended to withdraw his claims of unfair dismissal, indirect sex discrimination, and direct and indirect age discrimination. The judge therefore recorded those claims as dismissed on withdrawal.
The tribunal then considered the respondents' position on deposit orders and the surrounding case management history. The judge accepted the claimant's submission that he would be prejudiced if required to answer the application without the disclosure previously ordered, including documents he had been seeking, and noted that the respondent had not complied with the earlier disclosure timetable. In those circumstances, the judge dismissed any application for deposit orders and converted the hearing into case management.
The judgment did not determine the remaining substantive claims. Instead, it made directions for further disclosure, clarification of the allegations against the individual respondents, finalisation of the list of issues, and preparation for the listed final hearing. The order records that the remaining issues, including remedy if the claimant succeeded, were to be determined at the final hearing.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed on withdrawal; the claimant said he lacked sufficient qualifying service. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | Indirect sex discrimination was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Age discrimination | Direct age discrimination was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Age discrimination | Indirect age discrimination was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.