Case 3319182/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Mr D Chapman, solicitor — 2021
- Case reference
- 3319182/2019
- Decision date
- 29 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bedeau Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Watford before Employment Judge Bedeau on 11-12 November 2021, determined Mrs Nicola Jacobs' claims against CVS (UK) Limited. It found that the claim for constructive unfair dismissal was not well-founded and dismissed it.
The tribunal also found that the claim for unauthorised deductions from wages was not well-founded and dismissed it. The written record does not record any monetary award or any split of compensation between claims, and it notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing with written reasons only to follow if requested.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment states that the claim for constructive unfair dismissal was not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claim for unauthorised deductions from wages was not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.